The Trump Family Project WLFI Sells Off ETH at a Loss of Millions, How Many Chips Does It Still Hold?

By: blockbeats|2025/04/09 15:00:03
0
Share
copy
Original Article Title: "The Behind-the-Scenes of WLFI's ETH Dump: Stop Loss or Another Scheme?"
Original Article Author: Luke, Mars Finance

On April 9, 2025, a wallet allegedly linked to World Liberty Financial (WLFI) dumped 5,471 ETH at an average price of $1,465, cashing out approximately $8.01 million. This was no small matter—this wallet had previously splurged $210 million to accumulate 67,498 ETH at an average price of $3,259, now facing an unrealized loss of $125 million. As a DeFi star project endorsed by the Trump family, WLFI's move is puzzling: why liquidate at this critical moment? How much more ETH can be sold? Will there be more dumps in the future?

The Trump Family Project WLFI Sells Off ETH at a Loss of Millions, How Many Chips Does It Still Hold?

A Tough Decision in the Chilling Market

Currently, the crypto market seems to be shrouded in cold air, with ETH price fluctuating between $1,465 and $1,503, more than halving from WLFI's purchase price. Looking back to the beginning of 2025, the optimism brought by Trump's inauguration had prompted WLFI to significantly increase its ETH holdings, seemingly attempting to soar with the policy tailwind. Unfortunately, the good times did not last long, and the continued slump of ETH turned this enthusiasm into a massive $125 million unrealized loss. From $89 million in March to $125 million now, the snowball of losses keeps growing.

The timing of the sell-off is intriguing. On the same day, a whale scooped up 4,677 ETH at $1,481, intensifying the market's long vs. short game. WLFI's decision to act at this moment may indicate a sense of a short-term bottom or a fear of further price decline. Regardless, this $8.01 million cash-out is like selling an old coat in the winter—it's reluctant but inevitable.

Why Sell: Stop Loss or Another Plan?

Why did WLFI cut losses at this point? The answer may not be simple.

Firstly, the logic of stop-loss is obvious. With each ETH dropping by $1,794, selling 5,471 ETH may incur a near-million-dollar loss, but it's better than watching the remaining 62,027 ETH continue to depreciate. It's like cutting off a "deadbeat stock" in the stock market, securing cash first. After all, if fully liquidated at the current price, the loss would almost hit $111 million—who can bear that?

Furthermore, the pressure on cash flow cannot be ignored. WLFI basked in the glory of a $590 million token sale for a while, but expenses for operations, partnerships, and new projects will not stop. While $8.01 million may not be a lot, it can provide relief in a market downturn. Just think, a project backed by the Trump family surely cannot let its wallet run dry, right?

Moreover, this may be an attempt at a strategic pivot. WLFI's asset pool contains not only ETH but also "veterans" like WBTC, TRX, and "rising stars" in the RWA space. By reducing ETH holdings, freeing up funds to invest in partners like Ondo Finance or betting on the potential of Layer 2 could be a way to prepare for the future. After all, the stage of DeFi is large, and ETH is just one of the players.

Lastly, don't forget about external perception. As the "favorite son" of the Trump family, WLFI shines with prestige but also carries controversy. With 75% of profits in the whitepaper going to the family while risks are shifted to token holders, this model has long raised suspicions. Could this sell-off be due to investor pressure to prove that they are not solely relying on the "celebrity effect" to thrive? It's unlikely, but not entirely unreasonable.

Overall, stop-losses and liquidity are the most immediate driving forces, while strategic adjustments may hint at what's to come. As for external pressures, perhaps they are just the background music of this drama.

How Much More Can Be Sold: Trump Card and Bottom Line

After selling 5,471 tokens, WLFI still holds 62,027 ETH, which is worth approximately $90.9 million at the current price. How much more can this trump card reveal?

From a funding perspective, if each sale targets around $8 million in cash flow, selling another approximately 5,000 tokens would suffice, leaving a "safety net" of $56 million in holdings. However, if there is a larger funding gap, such as for a new project launch or debt maturity, selling a few tens of thousands of tokens is not out of the question. However, doing this would undoubtedly raise doubts about ETH's core position.

The market's ability to handle this is also crucial. The recent $8.01 million sale did not cause much of a stir, and the daily trading volume of ETH at $5 billion seems able to absorb it. But if WLFI were to dump tens of millions of dollars' worth of assets in one go, panic could further drive down prices. For precaution, selling in small batches appears to be their style.

Much more crucial is the strategic bottom line. WLFI views ETH as a "strategic reserve," and if holdings drop below half (around 33.74 million tokens), its image as a DeFi leader may be at risk. Unless absolutely necessary, they are unlikely to easily deplete this reserve. In the short term, selling another 5,000 to 10,000 tokens (approximately $7.3 million to $14.65 million) is a reasonable estimate, both quenching thirst and avoiding harm.

Will the Sell-off Continue?

In the future, will WLFI continue to sell off? The answer lies within three key clues.

First, watch the market sentiment. If ETH drops below $1,400 and the unrealized losses increase by another one or two hundred million, the urge to sell off may be unstoppable. However, if the price rebounds to $1,800, and unrealized losses shrink to $90 million, they might hold onto their assets tightly, even regaining confidence to buy back. Currently, the $1,450 support level and $1,600 resistance level serve as indicators.

Second, internal calculations are also crucial. If WLFI still aims to play a leading role in the DeFi space, they cannot afford to see ETH's position heavily impacted. In this case, the sell-off may gradually slow down. However, if they set their sights on other trends, such as RWA or emerging tokens, ETH may become a "cash machine," accelerating the sell-off pace.

Third, external factors matter. The pro-crypto stance of the Trump administration acts as a shield for WLFI. If a significant move is made in the second quarter leading to market recovery, they might sit comfortably on the sidelines. Yet, if the family is caught up in political turmoil or investors demand transparency, the pressure to cash out will be inevitable.

In the short term (one to two months), there is a possibility of small-scale sell-offs, with the total amount ranging from $10 to $20 million. If the market continues to slump, a mid-term sell-off could account for 30% to 50% of the remaining holdings, totaling $27 to $45 million. Looking ahead, unless ETH stages a complete turnaround, WLFI may gradually fade from this field, moving their chips to a new battleground.

Ethereum Fundamental Transition: Why Are Whales Turning Bearish?

In recent years, Ethereum's fundamentals seem to be undergoing a quiet transition, which may be a crucial reason why whales are becoming pessimistic about ETH's future. Glassnode data shows that over the past four years, Ethereum's active address count has remained almost stagnant, hovering around the same level, failing to significantly grow alongside market trends. This is not the "efficiency range" of technical optimization but rather resembles a depletion of growth momentum, indicating Ethereum's fatigue in attracting new users and developers.

Meanwhile, the emergence of Layer 2 (L2) solutions was supposed to bring new vitality to Ethereum but unexpectedly weakened its value capture ability. L2 significantly reduced mainnet Gas fees by diverting transaction volume (Gas fees dropped over 70% in March 2025). While this is user-friendly, it allows L2 to intercept the value that was supposed to be fed back to ETH holders through the EIP-1559 burning mechanism, further squeezing Ethereum's "profit space." Some analyses suggest that unless the mainnet can revitalize its demand for block space through large-scale tokenization, Ethereum's long-term competitiveness may be at risk.

The perspective of institutions also reflects this concern. In a report, CoinShares pointed out that the frequent adjustments to the Ethereum protocol (such as the Dencun hard fork) have brought about uncertainty, hindering institutional investors from building reliable valuation models, thereby diminishing its attractiveness. In March 2025, Standard Chartered lowered its price target for Ethereum in 2025 to $4,000, citing structural decay as the reason.

Jon Charbonneau, Co-Founder of the crypto investment firm DBA, also stated that Ethereum's issuance model under the Proof of Stake (PoS) mechanism faces fundamental trade-off issues, with adjustment being difficult to resolve the core contradiction. On the X platform, some users even bluntly said that Ethereum has "barely changed since 2016," with upgrades being slow and missing the window for rapid transformation, seemingly becoming a "victim" of its own success.

Meanwhile, EigenLayer's Stakedrop event also left the market disappointed, as the narrative of enhancing ETH holding rewards through Restaking was shattered due to unfair distribution, further undermining the confidence of large holders. These signals collectively point to a reality: Ethereum's fundamentals are being eroded by internal and external factors, with its once growth engine now showing signs of fatigue, and the pessimism of large holders may indeed be a direct response to this trend.

Summary

This sell-off event not only revealed WLFI's struggle in the market downturn but also highlighted Ethereum's deeper predicament. The stagnant growth of active addresses, L2 value diversion, signals of institutional pessimism, all contribute to casting a shadow over Ethereum's fundamentals, with the confidence of large holders wavering. WLFI's next move, whether to continue selling or strategically pivot, will unfold in the dual game of markets and policies.

For investors, while chasing the hype may be enticing, a more composed judgment is needed: Can Ethereum's future be revitalized? Where will WLFI's bold gamble lead? The answer, perhaps, can only be revealed with time.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more